This inaugural blog on the mechanism, diagnosis and treatment
of spine and radicular pain appropriately opens with discussion of the most
important element of spine care in the United States and the world for that
matter – THE PATIENT.
Do you ever empathize with a person in spine pain who is
seeking care – the stressful decisions to be made with sometimes with little
knowledge of the problem? Can you blame him or her? Fact-filled alternatives
are missing for such hard decisions. Just consider the following
truths about spine care today.
SURGERY CONSIDERATION
Surgery yields varying feelings and opinions by patients and
for good reason. Consider the following scientific papers on surgeons’
disagreement on spine surgery. The better trained the surgeon the less spine
surgery is performed. More surgery is done by private clinics and 4 times less
in academic and teaching institutions. (1) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis has
variability in both non-operative and operative management. The appropriateness
of surgery and specific surgical procedures have not been defined for this
important pathology of the aging spine. (2) Such statistics support the
patient’s plight in treatment decision making.
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS IN CHOOSING CHIROPRACTIC CARE
Patients seeking chiropractic care are known to be
intelligent seekers of their best care. In a study of non-Hispanic black
patients who went to chiropractors, they tended to be female, be older, be
college educated, be employed, and have a positive viewpoint on their
interactions with their chiropractor. (3) Other studies have documented this as
well. So successful is spinal manipulation that physical therapists now
practice all forms of chiropractic manipulation from high velocity to Cox® Technic
flexion distraction and publish peer reviewed papers on it. In Germany, study
of manual therapy by general medical doctors for nonspecific low back pain
benefits is to be conducted. (4)
COX® TECHNIC FLEXION DISTRACTION AND DECOMPRESSION SPINAL
MANIPULATION
Cox® Technic flexion distraction and decompression spinal
manipulation is a popular and growing form of spine care for people suffering
from disc degeneration, disc herniation and spinal stenosis that cause leg pain
called sciatica and arm pain and other spinal conditions such as
spondylolisthesis, transitional segments, scoliosis, facet disease, pregnancy,
spondylolysis, osteoporosis, arthritis, and so many more diagnoses.
Spinal mobilizations - low velocity passive oscillatory
movements such as Cox® flexion distraction decompression spinal manipulation - are
reported to reduce spinal pain in some patient subgroups by an endogenous pain
inhibition system mediated by the central nervous system. Cox® flexion
distraction low velocity low amplitude spinal manipulation shows short-term,
remote antinociceptive effect similar to clinical findings in a rat study. (5,6) This author financed the building of a Cox® spinal manipulation instrument that
is 1/12 the size of a regular Cox® manipulation instrument. It was built at the
University of Iowa with input from Ram Gudavalli, PhD, and is used for rat
experimentation as described here. Quite exciting to see how many years of
study and research can lead to new approaches.
LITERATURE STATISTICS ON BENEFITS OF SPINAL MANIPULATION
COMPARED TO SURGERY
Favorable outcomes of back pain and radiculopathy are
attained in the vast majority of patients under non-operative care. Surgical
intervention is reserved for patients who have significant pain that is refractory,
non-responsive to at least 6 weeks of conservative care. This author finds this
window of time adequate to reverse back and extremity pain in the majority of
cases with Cox® Technic Flexion Distraction and Decompression spinal
manipulation. Patients who have a severe or progressive motor deficit, or
patients who have any symptoms of bowel or bladder dysfunction are surgical
candidates but this occurs in a small minority of cases, less than 1% with the
condition called cauda equina syndrome. (7)
The Bone And Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force On Neck Pain
and its associated disorders searched 5 databases from 2000 to 2014 finding
8551 citations for study. New evidence suggests that mobilization,
manipulation, and clinical massage are effective interventions for the management
of neck pain. It also suggests that electroacupuncture, strain-counterstrain,
relaxation massage, and some passive physical modalities (heat, cold,
diathermy, hydrotherapy, ultrasound) are not effective and should not be used
to manage neck pain. (8)
DEPRESSION IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS
Chronic low back pain is known to cause anxiety and
depression for the patient. Can you blame them? Suffering without relief will
make anyone anxious. The complex, bidirectional correlation between chronic low
back pain and generalized anxiety disorder, common in primary care, can
increase the risk of inadequate treatment. (9) Chronic low back pain
participants have lower working memory performance and higher pain
catastrophizing compared to pain-free
controls. (10) This author finds patient
confidence and understanding of their condition reduces depression; some
patients state their relief to now just understand their condition as it had
not been explained to them by any prior healthcare consultant, doctor or surgeon
in an understandable language.
CONSIDERATION OF HIGH VELOCITY LOW AMPLITUDE VERSUS LOW
VELOCITY VARIABLE AMPLITUDE SPINE MANIPULATION BY SPINE CONDITIONS
Classic side posture high velocity low amplitude spinal
manipulation was compared to Cox® flexion distraction non thrust spinal
manipulation in a study of 192 participants, mean age 40 years, 54% male with
subacute and chronic low back pain. Similar effects in short-term low back pain
improvement for both were superior to a wait list control. (11) This author
notes the mean age of the 192 patients was 40, and Cox states that the older
the patient the more reliable is flexion distraction decompression spinal
manipulation due to degenerative spine disease and inability of the patient to
tolerate high velocity thrust adjustment. Also no radicular patients were part
of this study and radicular patients, show Cox® flexion distraction
decompression non thrust adjusting has great superiority because side posture
thrust adjusting is not well tolerated and is shown to aggravate disc
herniation and spinal stenosis. Here is seen the erudite decision making of the
chiropractor in determining spinal manipulation use and application. (11)
CONCLUDING PATIENT INTERESTS IN CHIROPRACTIC MANIPULATION
Lastly, evidence based clinical practice is three entities:
- research
- clinical expertise
- patient satisfaction and preference.
Chiropractic must persist in the research for documentation
of its contribution to the epidemic problem of spine pain. Dissemination of
this research to the chiropractic field doctor is an absolute necessity so he
or she can implement the principles taught. Patient satisfaction with
chiropractic research and clinical superiority will maintain the leadership
role for chiropractic in spine care management.
Cox® Technic flexion distraction and decompression spinal
manipulation has published scientific papers on the biomechanics and clinical
outcomes of the technic for spine and radicular pain. Standards of care for
cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine spinal manipulation are published as well
as tutorials in the application of the flexion distraction and decompression
technic. For full study of the work,
go to the website www.coxtechnic.com. There
you will find copies of the research papers, descriptions of Protocol I
and II applications of the technic, clinical outcome studies, and case presentations of spinal
conditions such as spinal stenosis, intervertebral disc herniation,
spondylolisthesis, Bertolotti’s syndrome, facet syndrome, synovial cyst, Tarlov
cyst, scoliosis, and subluxation. Cox
Technic Complete® program websites
like this one more fully go into the examination, physical, orthopedic,
neurological and diagnostic imaging of spine pain patients which are shown in
video for patients to study and then arrange care with the physician. These
studies are designed to lead to the most prudent diagnosis of the patient’s
condition. Study opportunities with
Dr. Cox and other certified chiropractors for those interested in the
procedures are given. Certification
following 32 hours of hands on and didactic study is available for
international referral
directory opportunities.
Clinical validity of Cox® Technic is shown in the just
published Clinical
Practice Guideline: Chiropractic Care for Low Back Pain in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
published online January 19, 2016. (12) It
shares that “currently, the most robust literature regarding manual therapy for
low back pain is based primarily on high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA)
techniques, and mobilization (such as flexion-distraction) therefore, in the
absence of contraindications, these methods are generally recommended.” (12) This validation of Cox® flexion distraction decompression spinal manipulation
is necessary for developing chiropractic’s role in spine treatment.
It is the leadership of superior spinal manipulation that
will ultimately draw the public’s acceptance. It is my opinion that our path of
research, clinical application and patient preference is large in the future of
expanded chiropractic medicine.
Thank you for studying with me.
Respectfully submitted,
James M. Cox, DC, DACBR, FICC, Hon.D.Litt., FACO(H)
1/26/16
Currently rated 3.6 by 7 people
- Currently 3.571429/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5